New Stonewall Democrats Come Out Blazing

October 3, 2007 at 6:48 am 6 comments

The Stonewall Democrats under the leadership of its new executive director Jon Hoadley have come out smart and serious in the effort to pass a trans-inclusive ENDA. In the week since the drama around the Democratic House leadership’s decision to remove gender identity and expression from the bill, Stonewall has played a key role in building LGBT community support an inclusive bill.

First came the letter which the group and eight other organizations signed speaking out against removal of the tran inclusive language from ENDA.

Then came the No Substitute online petition campaign which enabled LGBT Americans not connected to the activist scene to register their support for an inclusive bill.

Now Stonewall has moved swiftly to work with its thousands of members across the country to organize in-district meetings with members of Congress to shore up support among wavering Democrats for an inclusive bill.

From the Stonewall website:

Take Action Today on ENDA!

As you may know – Congress recently took a key step towards preserving the original Employment Non-Discrimination Act. We had expected the U.S. House Committee on Education & Labor to take action yesterday on the substitute bill. However, in response to our organizing efforts, the Democratic Leadership decided to postpone action until later this month. This is good news! We have (at best) two short weeks to continue to build our support for the original ENDA.

WHAT YOU CAN DO:

Over the next few days, we will be working with our Stonewall Democrats chapters to schedule in-district meetings with Democratic Members of the Committee on Education & Labor. Apart from meeting with our chapters, we are encouraging you to schedule your own in-district meeting with a Member if you live in their district.

In your meeting, encourage your Representative to:

a) Strongly support to the original ENDA which includes sexual orientation and gender identity.
b) Oppose moving forward any substitute bill that does not include gender identity.

We have included contact information for Committee Members below. Please note that the main district office is listed first.
We know that many of our members live in the districts of Committee Members. If you do, your in-district meeting will be crucial. And if you live outside of one of the following districts, we will be following up with you shortly.

Thanks so much,

National Stonewall Democrats
— Encourage people to visit, and take action at, www.NoSubstitutes.org
======

This is the kind of smart action that we need to build support for LGBT legislation.

You can find contact information for the targeted members of the House here.

You can sign the No Substitute petition here.

Advertisements

Entry filed under: Advocacy, Democrats, LGBT, Liberals, Politics. Tags: , , , , , , , , .

We Need to Get Real About ENDA Bush Vetoes Health Coverage for Poor Kids

6 Comments Add your own

  • 1. Marti Abernathey  |  October 3, 2007 at 9:20 am

    now THAT isn’t vague đŸ˜‰

    That’s what HRC SHOULD have been doing.

    Reply
  • 2. Marti Abernathey  |  October 3, 2007 at 9:20 am

    oh, and great job, SWD!

    Reply
  • 3. Bloggernista  |  October 3, 2007 at 9:35 am

    Its the kind of thing that all of our organizations should be doing.

    I had the pleasure of working with Stonewall’s communication director John Marble on a congressional campaign in Boston in 2001 and of meeting the new executive director Jon Hoadley. Both are incredibly smart and together they will take Stonewall to new heights.

    Reply
  • 4. theyellowmenace  |  October 3, 2007 at 12:31 pm

    It’s about time. Thank you, SWD, for putting this effort forth. And, yes, this is what HRC should have been doing. I gave up on that org around 1999 when, after going to the NGLTF conference and talking about ENDA with HRC reps, they told me HRC was (get this) pulling trans language out of ENDA because they didn’t feel they could get enough votes.

    All I could do was smile and nod, but I wondered how Sylvia Rivera must have felt that trans issues were being abandoned by a group born out of a coalition she helped to form.

    Reply
  • 5. Tom  |  October 3, 2007 at 2:39 pm

    I want to know who the democrat legislators are that would not support trans inclusion. The democratic leadership did a “whip” poll, so someone knows this information. How many don’t support it? How many are from districts in states that do or do not have protection? How are we going to be effective in changing minds, if we don’t know who is against trans inclusion?

    Reply
  • […] I Said (Top Posts) New Stonewall Democrats Come Out BlazingLarry Kramer Asks “Why Are We So Passive?”Letter to Ann CoulterThe Politics of PoliticsSuze Orman is […]

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed


AddThis Feed Button
Political Blogs - Blog Catalog Blog Directory

Blog Stats

  • 833,200 hits

Archives


%d bloggers like this: