More Sour Grapes From McCain

October 19, 2008 at 12:31 pm 18 comments

You would think that after Colin Powell endorsed Barack Obama citing the negative tone of the GOP, that John McCain would lay off the sour grapes. And, you would be wrong.

Check out this hostile interview between McCain and Chris Wallace of Fox News. Yes, McCain is now on the offensive against Republican Party-loving Fox News.

McCain is defending the slanderous robo-calls that his campaign is using to attack Sen. Obama. How bad are these robo-calls? Republican Sen. Susan Collins of Maine is asking McCain to stop running the calls in her state.

Advertisements

Entry filed under: 2008 Election, Campaigns, Conservatives, John McCain, Politics, Republicans, Video, YouTube. Tags: , , , .

Show Your Hometown Pride Apple Comes Out Against Prop. 8

18 Comments Add your own

  • 1. People in the Sun  |  October 19, 2008 at 11:01 pm

    Chris Wallace was always the one I could watch without screaming at the TV. I still get angry, but I don’t scream so much.

    Reply
  • 2. GayProf  |  October 21, 2008 at 2:19 pm

    Desperate, desperate, desperate.

    Reply
  • 3. D.A. Slinkard  |  October 21, 2008 at 11:55 pm

    LOL, (Yawn)…where to begin, where to begin….first with Colin Powell, this was about advancing a political agenda for….Colin Powell. In the ’90s we heard Powell describe why it was that he was aligning himself with the Republican Party and due to his endorsement then, he became the Secretary of State.

    As we all know, Powell’s image was tarnished with his announcement of WMD’s and so it is easily fathomable that Powell would do what he did. He endorsed Obama and what, surprise, surprise, it was announced that Obama will have a position for Powell. An endorsement simply to advance his own career. Repudiate it all you want, but a spade is a spade.

    As for the Maine Republican, Michael Crawford, have you ever been to the state or lived in the state for anytime at all? It is one of the most liberal states in the U.S. and if someone considers themself a Conservative in Maine, their ideology would be Democrat by other states’ views.

    You’re an angry black man supporting another angry black man. Mute the television the next time he’s on the news and he looks like any other black man trying to dispute that “he’s not that baby’s father” as is the case on shows like Jerry Springer and Maury. Face it, with the character associations of Obama, he needs to be on Springer and Maury….Ayers, Wright, Rezko…you are the joke for believing in someone who associates with others to advance his own career and then when he is called upon it, throws them under the bus.

    Reply
  • 4. Webster  |  October 22, 2008 at 11:15 am

    You know what, Slinky? You’re a Limbaugh-spewing racist. Take your blubbery ass elsewhere and vomit up your Right-wing propoganda.

    You have no power here. Begone before someone drops a house on you.

    Reply
  • 5. D.A. Slinkard  |  October 22, 2008 at 10:38 pm

    LOL, there you go again with your typically liberal response of attacking the messenger not the message. I am in no means a racist, yet you try and belittle me by making this accusation. Call me what you want, but you’re still a pussy cat according to your picture.

    I’m not worried about having any power here, I wonder if I did get hit by a house if it would have a good mortgage or a bad mortgage on it thanks to the Christopher Dodds and Barney Franks of your party? Besides, this site is proof positive you cannot fix stupid.

    Reply
  • 6. Webster  |  October 23, 2008 at 9:13 am

    Slinky, YOU are proof that one cannot fix stupid. Is there a single glass of Limbaugh Kool-aid you haven’t swallowed to the last drop?

    Reply
  • 7. D.A. Slinkard  |  October 23, 2008 at 6:15 pm

    Yet again another response lacking substance…keep it up and you’ll need to change your wordpress handle from Webster to Barrack Obama.

    Reply
  • 8. Webster  |  October 23, 2008 at 8:52 pm

    Your candidate is losing, Slinky. Who is going to pay any attention to someone who can’t even spell the next President’s name? It’s “Barack,” and you better get used to it, fool.

    Reply
  • 9. zenith  |  October 24, 2008 at 1:01 am

    Yes, McCain is now on the offensive against Republican Party, Take a glance at the issues- http://minekey.com/election08 before heading to voting booth.

    Reply
  • 10. D.A. Slinkard  |  October 24, 2008 at 7:07 am

    I figured it out! Webster is Michael Crawford’s Tool! Lol, that’s what you are. OMG! Look back, you’re his sound byte in defending him.

    LOL…now the picture of the pussy cat is making more sense. Webster the tool, man I am going to have write an entire post about you the tool.

    Reply
  • 11. D.A. Slinkard  |  October 24, 2008 at 7:09 am

    Oh and btw, my responses our sent to my wordpress account and for post # 7, I had Barack spelled correctly. It wasn’t until you pointed it out that the name difference appeared.

    Hmmm….Yeah, you’re still a tool.

    Reply
  • 12. Webster  |  October 24, 2008 at 11:58 am

    “Oh and btw, my responses “our” sent…”

    Can’t spell “Barack” and can’t even spell “are.” Gives me all kinds of confidence in your mental abilities, Slinky. You’re such a clown.

    Reply
  • 13. Jane  |  October 24, 2008 at 1:57 pm

    Darnell the Hair Whisperer is Gaylarious!

    Reply
  • 14. D.A. Slinkard  |  October 24, 2008 at 5:58 pm

    Webster- again all you are providing is more and more Liberal pyschobabble. Keep it up, I’m sure you’re racking up the points in the world of whacked-out Liberals.

    Reply
  • 15. Michael Crawford  |  October 24, 2008 at 8:31 pm

    D.A., shouldn’t you be some place getting all hot and bothered about Sarah “America’s Next Top Right-Wing Model and not spending so much time on gay blogs?

    Reply
  • 16. D.A. Slinkard  |  October 25, 2008 at 7:05 am

    You make an excellent point….that is Sarah Palin is much more beautiful than any other Democrat leader that I can think of…I mean think about it, Albright, Hill Clinton, Nancy Pelosi,…..ugggghhh.

    Feminists are just ugly people hatin’ on beautiful people. Come to think of it, the Feminists that I know, are ugly…makes perfect sense.

    Reply
  • 17. Webster  |  October 25, 2008 at 9:55 am

    Just when I think you can’t get any more shallow, Slinky, you sink to greater depths.

    So we just add “chauvinist pig” to your credentials as a racist. Thank God your era is just about over in American history.

    Reply
  • 18. D.A. Slinkard  |  October 25, 2008 at 7:26 pm

    (Yawn) Your insults are getting weaker and weaker with every try. Keep it up and you’ll represent all minions in Liberal Land!

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed


AddThis Feed Button
Political Blogs - Blog Catalog Blog Directory

Blog Stats

  • 832,724 hits

Archives


%d bloggers like this: